Testimonials
|
Support the Fight for the First Amendment
and Dr. Ehrenfeld's Work!
|
 |
Publishers Welcome Congressional Initiatives to Fight Libel Tourism
The Association of American Publishers
Contact: Judith Platt/Deidre Huntington
Ph: (202) 220-4551/(202) 220-4550
Publishers Welcome Congressional Initiatives to Fight Libel Tourism
Washington, DC, May 23, 2008: The Association of American Publishers (AAP)
applauded the introduction in Congress of legislation that would discourage
the use of foreign defamation lawsuits as a weapon to silence or intimidate
American journalists, authors, and publishers. AAP said that the U.S.
publishing industry welcomed the new federal legislative initiatives to
support American authors and publishers whose First Amendment rights are
threatened by libel tourism, the cynical exploitation of libel laws in
foreign jurisdictions that lack our strong constitutional free speech
protections...
More >>
Specter, Lieberman, King Introduce Free Speech Protection Act
WASHINGTON, D.C. (May 7, 2008) — U.S. Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA), Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Senator Joseph Lieberman (I-CT), Chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, and U.S. Representative Peter King (R-NY), Ranking Member of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Homeland Security, today announced the introduction of the Free Speech Protection Act of 2008. This bill would protect American journalists from libel suits brought in foreign courts that do not have the same protections for free speech that are found in the U.S. constitution. It mirrors H.R. 5814, legislation recently introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives by Representative King.
PUBLISHERS APPLAUD SIGNING OF NEW YORK LIBEL TOURISM BILL
Governor Signs “Libel Terrorism Protection Act” Into Law
Foreign Law and the First Amendment
Sign Rachel's Law, April 29, 2008
Floyd Abrams support letter to Gov. Paterson, April 23, 2008
The NY City Bar position paper in support of the bill
COMMITTEE ON COMMUNICATIONS AND MEDIA LAW THE LIBEL TERRORISM PROTECTION ACT
S.6687 B Senator Skelos; A.9652 M of A Lancman
AN ACT relating to personal jurisdiction and enforceability of certain foreign judgments
in cases involving defamation.
THIS BILL IS APPROVED
PEN Letter of Support of the "Libel Terrorism Protection Act", March 10, 2008
Petition from Rabbi Raskin (CHABAD) Supporting the "Libel Terrorism Protection Act", February 13, 2008
The Authors Guild support letter of support for the "Libel Terrorism Protection Act", February 12, 2008
New York DA, Robert M. Morgenthau support of the "Libel Terrorism Protection Act", February 11, 2008
Letter from George Shultz, the former Secretary of State, and R. James Woolsey, the former CIA Director, in support of the "Libel Terrorism Protection Act", February 6, 2008
9/11 Families for a Secure America Support of the "Libel Terrorism Protection Act", February 5, 2008
THE TERROR FINANCE BLOG Memorandum of Support for the "Libel Terrorism Protection Act" (S.6687/A.9652), January 28, 2008
The Middle East Forum – Memorandum of Support for the "Libel Terrorism Protection Act" ( S.6687/A.9652) January 21, 2008
Memorandum of support - The Association of American Publishers (AAP), January 14, 2008
Act for America, Petition: Support the "Libel Terrorism Protection Act" February 1, 2008
Help Us Stop "Libel Terrorism" http://www.actforamerica.org
Add your name to the group of 1,535 people who have already signed using the Internet!
The "Libel Terrorism Protection Act" has been introduced in the New York Assembly and Senate. Its objective is as important as it is simple — protect New York authors and publishers from lawsuits filed in foreign court jurisdictions that are intended to intimidate and silence exposure of terrorism and enablers of terrorism.
People like Saudi billionaire Khalid Salim bin Mahfouz are using courts in foreign jurisdictions, where free press and speech rights do not have the same protection as they do in the United States, to win libel lawsuits against American authors and publishers. Bin Mahfouz has filed dozens of such lawsuits, and in the face of those suits, numerous American authors and publishers have chosen to apologize, issue retractions and pull books from the market, rather than spend millions in legal fees fighting the suits.
Our cherished rights of free speech and press are under assault. If libel terrorism is not stopped, more and more American authors and publishers will be afraid to write and publish works that expose terrorism and its enablers — and that will undermine our national security.
Please fill out the form below to add your name to our petition calling on the New York Assembly and Senate to pass the "Libel Terrorism Protection Act" and protect our First Amendment rights — and our nation. Then, forward this petition to your friends and family.
Please Pass the "Libel Terrorism Protection Act"
We the undersigned call on the New York Assembly and Senate to proceed with all due speed to pass the "Libel Terrorism Protection Act," bill number A9652/S6687.
This bill is necessary to protect the First Amendment rights of New York authors and publishers from libel suits filed in foreign jurisdictions. Foreign courts do not provide the standard of legal protection afforded authors in America under the First Amendment. That this protection is necessary is illustrated by the fact that one plaintiff alone has used threats and filed dozens of lawsuits in British courts, successfully intimidating American authors and publishers who chose to apologize, retract, pay fines and pull books from the market, instead of spending millions of dollars in legal fees in the notoriously plaintiff-friendly British court.
Without the protection afforded by the Libel Terrorism Protection Act, increasing numbers of authors and publishers will be subject to "libel terrorism" intended to silence their exposure of activities related to and individuals who are enablers of terrorism. This cannot be allowed to happen.
New York is the publishing "capital" of America. Therefore, the Libel Terrorism Protection Act has national implications for the rights of free speech and free press. If these precious First Amendment rights are allowed to be undermined through "libel terrorism" actions, the very bedrock of America's freedom will be undermined. This cannot be allowed to happen.
The Libel Terrorism Protection Act also has implications for America's national security. If plaintiffs are allowed to intimidate into silence New York authors and publishers, crucial information concerning the threat of terrorism will not be published. This cannot be allowed to happen.
The Libel Terrorism Protection Act would update New York "long arm" statutes to protect the rights of New Yorkers and Americans, setting an example for other states, and providing a template for a powerful potential U.S. federal statute. It would protect citizens' rights to education by a free press and enable journalists to expose terror funding without fear. We commend the New York legislators for authoring the Libel Terrorism Protection Act, and we the undersigned urge the New York Assembly and Senate to pass the Act as soon as is practicable.
Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld, a U.S. Citizen, is suing Saudi billionaire Sheik Khalid Salim bin Mahfouz, the former banker of the Saudi royal family who is has been widely reported to fund terrorist organizations such as HAMAS and al-Qaeda. She is suing Mahfouz in the United States to protect her First Amendment right after he sued her for libel in the UK in an attempt to silence her from reporting about his activities and reported links to Islamist terrorists.
On June 8, 2007, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals breathed vitality into my case against Saudi billionaire Khaled bin Mahfouz--handing my extraordinary lawyer, Daniel Kornstein (and associates) an important victory--and establishing a legal precedent that henceforward affects every American writer and publisher.
In suing Mahfouz, I asked the Federal Court to declare the default judgment against me obtained by bin Mahfouz in England's High Court---concerning details of his terror financing in my U.S.-published book, Funding Evil-- as unenforceable in the U.S., and contrary to the free speech protections Americans enjoy.
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals overruled the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in requesting that New York’s highest state court determine whether Mahfouz should personally be subject to New York jurisdiction.
The Second Circuit’s decision went further, ruling that my claim is “ripe,”--and therefore can be brought before a U.S. court. Thus, every American writer and publisher, finding themselves in a similar situation, can now seek a U.S. court decision.
On December 20, 2007 New York State Court of Appeals failed to protect American authors from libel judgments awarded by foreign courts. The court’s decision demands immediate legislative action to change the law regarding “personal jurisdiction,” granting legal protection to all N.Y. writers and publishers. ---Stay tuned.
Thanks!!!
R. James Woolsey, the former Director of the CIA, who wrote the foreword to "Funding Evil":
"Justice Brandeis once wrote that 'sunlight is the best disinfectant'. That principle is being
undermined today, even in our own country, by British libel law rulings that are increasingly tendentious and protective of
wealthy plaintiffs from Saudi Arabia and elsewhere in the Gulf who badly need some sunlight focused on their activities.
Rachel Ehrenfeld is fighting a lonely and vital battle to limit the chilling effect of these British rulings and keep them
from being given effect here. She deserves all of our help."
"Dr. Ehrenfeld is a respected scholar, who, to my knowledge, does not make irresponsible
charges ... She currently serves with me and former Secretary of State George Schulz on the board of directors of The
Committee on the Present Danger. We are dedicated to winning the war on terrorism, and the contribution of members like
Rachel Ehrenfeld has been invaluable."
Floyd Abrams, a First Amendment lawyer:
"This is an important issue. It imperils American authors writing for Americans about issues of
interest to them. American authors should line up and support the lawsuit."
James Goodale, former general counsel and vice chairman of the New York Times Co.:
"The Mahfouz suit is totally unfair. Ehrenfeld has not published her book in the United Kingdom.
She published it in the United States and has no control over special orders that have the book sent abroad through the
Internet."
Richard Perle, Resident Fellow, the American Enterprise Institute:
"Rachel Ehrenfeld has meticulously researched and responsibly written about the financing
of Islamist terrorist organizations. The Islamists whose activities have been revealed don't like that so they have used
their Saudi billions to silence her--and others--by suing her in the United Kingdom, even though her book was published
only in the United States. She has launched a counter suit of immense importance and it is vital that she prevail.
If Rachel's suit fails due to lack of financing, no publisher will print books or articles
exposing terrorist financing--and one of the essential weapons in the war against Islamist terror will be struck forever
from our hands."
Statement of 9/11 Families for a Secure America Board of Directors:
"The members of 9/11 FSA, as direct victims of the terrorist attacks of September 11,
2001, have therefore have a special interest in the uncovering of all those individuals and organizations which played
a role, either directly or indirectly, in the conspiracy which led to the mass murders of that day. It is for this
reason we support the position of the plaintiff Ehrenfeld."
Statement of The 9/11 Families United to Bankrupt Terrorism:
"The 9/11 Families United to Bankrupt Terrorism (9/11 Families) is an organization comprised of
thousands of family members who lost loved ones or were injured on September 11, 2001…are devoted to cutting off the flow of
terrorism financing. It is for this reason we support the position of the Plaintiff/Appellant Ehrenfeld.
This lawsuit, brought by Ms. Ehrenfeld, is the best way to insure that these rights which are
fundamental to our concept of freedom and liberty are not denigrated overseas by individuals who have channeled their
money and energy into an effort to destroy our citizens."
Contributions are fully tax deductible
The American Center for Democracy (ACD) is a tax-deductible, non-profit organization that qualify as exempt organizations under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and Regulations.
Your support is important to us, and will help our work in preserving democracy freedom.
Thank You!
Please print out your PayPal receipt.
It will constitute a proof of your tax-deductible donation for tax purposes.
|